Wednesday, June 25, 2014

Overhead Projectors to SMART Boards

When I first started teaching eight years ago, the primary technologies in my classroom were a desktop computer and a television. Most days of the week I relied on an overhead projector for one or more of my lessons and I stood and delivered information to my students. I didn't know any better -- in high school and college, it was the primary way of sharing information. Today, the television, desktop computer, and overhead projector in my classroom have been replaced with iPads, an Apple TV, and a SMART Board. When I attend a college course or professional development workshop, every person in the room is using a personal device. This shift has also not changed the delivery of information but the outcomes of it.

As a teacher, I am no longer the central figure in the classroom with my dry erase marker and transparencies. I am utilizing technological tools to facilitate learning in my classroom. My students have access to information, lessons, and assignments on my class website. They are no longer researching primarily from an encyclopedia but accessing articles and videos from a variety of sources. Students are also collaborating, creating, and storing work on Google Drive. It has created a generation of students who are self-directed and excelling in a model where teachers are facilitators. Some of the benefits outlined here on independent learning include students with life skills, curiosity, and resourcefulness. 

The biggest challenge to this model is actually educating the educators. Students are growing up in a generation where technological tools are emerging and growing with them and most educators in my school are struggling to keep up. A wide range of school priorities, from project based learning to differentiated instruction, seem to be separated from the idea of technology integration. They can be implemented rather easily as explained in this link on technology integration. Teachers can use puzzles, build vocabulary, and bring history to life. I recently opened a lesson using a website called Sporcle to introduce a unit (on the SMART Board) and the kids are hooked on it. This resource and others are engaging students and are geared towards their interests and skills.

The integration of technology into the classroom is necessary in order for students to have the skills to be successful in the 21st century. A recent article in the Washington Post suggests that it is taken a step further by integrating classes that offer instruction in the field of computer science. According to the article, 70% of new jobs in science, technology, engineering and math fields are for computer professionals. Some of the most well known entrepreneurs of this generation have benefited from this type of instruction and founded Microsoft, Facebook, and Dropbox. 


I can't imagine what a classroom will look like 20 years from now. I have seen it evolve from a generation of chalk boards and overheard projectors to one with 1:1 devices and interactive presentations surrounding you on three screens. Technology undoubtedly belongs in the classroom. It has shifted the culture of teaching and learning and will continue to do so into the future.



3 Comments:

At June 25, 2014 at 4:45 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

You seem very open-minded to rolling and changing with the times. I think that is the attitude all educators should have. You have seen technology evolve and change during your career, and you have evolved and changed with it. Awesome.

 
At June 28, 2014 at 1:13 PM , Blogger Unknown said...

Hi Derek,
That was a great post about how you've seen technology change in the classroom over your career. It seems that your school and you as a teacher have made quite a commitment to technology integration in the classroom! Thats great!, What grade do you teach? In researching for my blog last week it seemed like budget constraints were such an important factor, when it came to just getting the technology into the classroom(forget about effectively training the teachers, which seems like another giant roadblock). Did your town/taxpayers just make a commitment to better education by more funding, or did adding technology help reduce costs elsewhere?

 
At July 2, 2014 at 6:07 AM , Blogger Derek Hamilton said...

The majority of the funding came from grants. One grant was the through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act and the second grant was from the Nellie Mae Educational Foundation. We also received a sizable donation from a private donor and we were able to go 1:1 in grades 5-12.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home